EVO MORALES crumbling ORDER TO SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERNAL DEBACLE ASSUME AGGRESSIVE STANCE BY THEME FROM SEA TO CHILE INTERNAL PRESSURE DECOMPRESS.
The Bolivian head of state said that having established mutual trust and set a 13-point agenda, which included the maritime theme, "is already when concrete proposals to begin to discuss them. " Referring to the secret agenda to begin its so few, Michelle Bachelet, in which it came to promise a sovereign enclave landlocked Bolivian Pacific, for erritorio Chile, according to local press in Santa Cruz.
clarified that the submission of a proposal of this kind does not imply that it is a definite formula, but a working basis for finding a solution to the Bolivian demand for access to the Pacific coast.
"What good would that have a specific proposal until 23 March. I take this opportunity to respectfully ask the President (Sebastián Piñera), the Government, the Chilean people, who until March 23 I'll wait a concrete proposal, which is the basis for discussion, not the solution of course " he said.
That "would be a great satisfaction for the Bolivian people", he added. In the afternoon, the Chilean foreign minister, Alfredo Moreno told a news conference that his country is working for results, referring to statements by Morales. " Chile working for results, not by date " he said, reported Reuters.
However, it also said: "We share with President Morales in order to obtain specific solutions, particularly useful and feasible for the different subjects of the common agenda in the shortest time possible."
132 years ago Bolivia lost its access to the sea in a war that, with Peru, launched against Chile. As a result Santiago relations at ambassadorial level have been suspended since 1962, except for a hiatus between 1975 and 1978.
Since Morales took office in 2006 promoted, along with its counterpart in Chile, Michelle Bachelet, the so-called peoples' diplomacy, in order to achieve a stage of mutual trust on which to settle further discussion on the maritime theme.
Subsequently, both governments began working on an agenda 13 points, including the Bolivian demand, though not under the concept of sovereignty that the Constitution provides (CPE) in Article 267. However, local media have assured Bolivians that these talks, at the time, included a sovereign enclave Bolivia through Chilean territory.
The first week of February, the foreign ministers of Chile, Moreno, and Bolivia, David Choquehuanca, announced in La Paz the provision of printing as soon as possible the dialogue on the bilateral agenda.
However, both Moreno as president of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, made clear in several interventions not negotiate a solution that threatens the territorial integrity of Chile , which virtually ruled out the idea of \u200b\u200bsovereignty.
"I recall that in December 2010 the two presidents gathered in Foz do Iguazu, created a high level committee chaired by the two foreign ministers of Bolivia and Chile, to intensify joint efforts in this area, and has already met twice in less than 60 days, "Moreno recalled yesterday.
Morales reflected on the need to find a solution to this dispute and noted that Chile has started an internal debate on the situation of landlocked Bolivia.
"We are obliged to work in a complementary manner, to complement it. We need them and they need us, "said the president.
bilateral The next meeting dates have not been set. The Chilean Congressman Marcelo Díaz, the opposition Socialist Party (PS), said the unilateral granting of time does not help dialogue La Paz-Santiago.
"I think it inconvenience, do not think the Bolivian-Chilean relations can be handled within the time limits, unless within the time limits are set unilaterally. I think it does not help. It does not help in the effort we have been working and I think it breaks a certain dynamic relationship is complex, "he told La Razon.
Congressman Jorge Tarud ruling was in favor of suspending the dialogue. " Chile has no legal obligation to discuss sea with them." Tarud added, according to La Tercera: "With this kind of attitude and strict time limits placed unilaterally by Morales I make a call to suspend the dialogue with Bolivia."
Negative perception survey
The results of the Fifth Survey Bicentennial UC / Adimark, conducted between June 14 and July 20 in Chile, 35% of the population supports the port option to provide benefits Bolivia, while 43% rejects any concessions . The survey found that respondents are more reluctant than two years ago to provide economic benefits to Bolivia port. 35% of respondents agreed to give Bolivia " only economic benefits to occupy Chilean ports to export their products ."
Evo does not know anything about changing San Miguel
President Evo Morales said yesterday that it received no information on the removal of Walker San Miguel the post of consul of Bolivia in Chile and explained that this matter is under hands of Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca, who also was briefed on the matter.
February 13, the consul San Miguel announced the newspaper page that your management Seven completed in March this year and then will service as legal advisor in the Ministry.
"I do not I had thought about changing it or anything, but I always hear the suggestions of the Chancellor on the work in embassies or consulates. That is in the hands of the Chancellor, "the president said Thursday.
February 14, a day after the announcement was made public in San Miguel, Choquehuanca said he was "surprised" and said he was unaware a decision for the removal of San Miguel. However, opening a possibility: Perhaps the President has informed (although) the Chair usually communicate through the Foreign Ministry. "
Yesterday the President ruled out this possibility and, on two occasions, said the future of San Miguel "is in the hands of the Chancellor." The controversy comes at a time when Bolivia Chile awaiting a proposal sea.
clarified that the submission of a proposal of this kind does not imply that it is a definite formula, but a working basis for finding a solution to the Bolivian demand for access to the Pacific coast.
"What good would that have a specific proposal until 23 March. I take this opportunity to respectfully ask the President (Sebastián Piñera), the Government, the Chilean people, who until March 23 I'll wait a concrete proposal, which is the basis for discussion, not the solution of course " he said.
That "would be a great satisfaction for the Bolivian people", he added. In the afternoon, the Chilean foreign minister, Alfredo Moreno told a news conference that his country is working for results, referring to statements by Morales. " Chile working for results, not by date " he said, reported Reuters.
However, it also said: "We share with President Morales in order to obtain specific solutions, particularly useful and feasible for the different subjects of the common agenda in the shortest time possible."
132 years ago Bolivia lost its access to the sea in a war that, with Peru, launched against Chile. As a result Santiago relations at ambassadorial level have been suspended since 1962, except for a hiatus between 1975 and 1978.
Since Morales took office in 2006 promoted, along with its counterpart in Chile, Michelle Bachelet, the so-called peoples' diplomacy, in order to achieve a stage of mutual trust on which to settle further discussion on the maritime theme.
Subsequently, both governments began working on an agenda 13 points, including the Bolivian demand, though not under the concept of sovereignty that the Constitution provides (CPE) in Article 267. However, local media have assured Bolivians that these talks, at the time, included a sovereign enclave Bolivia through Chilean territory.
The first week of February, the foreign ministers of Chile, Moreno, and Bolivia, David Choquehuanca, announced in La Paz the provision of printing as soon as possible the dialogue on the bilateral agenda.
However, both Moreno as president of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, made clear in several interventions not negotiate a solution that threatens the territorial integrity of Chile , which virtually ruled out the idea of \u200b\u200bsovereignty.
"I recall that in December 2010 the two presidents gathered in Foz do Iguazu, created a high level committee chaired by the two foreign ministers of Bolivia and Chile, to intensify joint efforts in this area, and has already met twice in less than 60 days, "Moreno recalled yesterday.
Morales reflected on the need to find a solution to this dispute and noted that Chile has started an internal debate on the situation of landlocked Bolivia.
"We are obliged to work in a complementary manner, to complement it. We need them and they need us, "said the president.
bilateral The next meeting dates have not been set. The Chilean Congressman Marcelo Díaz, the opposition Socialist Party (PS), said the unilateral granting of time does not help dialogue La Paz-Santiago.
"I think it inconvenience, do not think the Bolivian-Chilean relations can be handled within the time limits, unless within the time limits are set unilaterally. I think it does not help. It does not help in the effort we have been working and I think it breaks a certain dynamic relationship is complex, "he told La Razon.
Congressman Jorge Tarud ruling was in favor of suspending the dialogue. " Chile has no legal obligation to discuss sea with them." Tarud added, according to La Tercera: "With this kind of attitude and strict time limits placed unilaterally by Morales I make a call to suspend the dialogue with Bolivia."
Negative perception survey
The results of the Fifth Survey Bicentennial UC / Adimark, conducted between June 14 and July 20 in Chile, 35% of the population supports the port option to provide benefits Bolivia, while 43% rejects any concessions . The survey found that respondents are more reluctant than two years ago to provide economic benefits to Bolivia port. 35% of respondents agreed to give Bolivia " only economic benefits to occupy Chilean ports to export their products ."
Evo does not know anything about changing San Miguel
President Evo Morales said yesterday that it received no information on the removal of Walker San Miguel the post of consul of Bolivia in Chile and explained that this matter is under hands of Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca, who also was briefed on the matter.
February 13, the consul San Miguel announced the newspaper page that your management Seven completed in March this year and then will service as legal advisor in the Ministry.
"I do not I had thought about changing it or anything, but I always hear the suggestions of the Chancellor on the work in embassies or consulates. That is in the hands of the Chancellor, "the president said Thursday.
February 14, a day after the announcement was made public in San Miguel, Choquehuanca said he was "surprised" and said he was unaware a decision for the removal of San Miguel. However, opening a possibility: Perhaps the President has informed (although) the Chair usually communicate through the Foreign Ministry. "
Yesterday the President ruled out this possibility and, on two occasions, said the future of San Miguel "is in the hands of the Chancellor." The controversy comes at a time when Bolivia Chile awaiting a proposal sea.
0 comments:
Post a Comment